01 / Already drafted
Review the draft
£195 charity / £395 company
A marked-up draft, criteria check and budget check, with the changes ranked.
One selected revision round included. Writing from scratch is separate.
Explore a reviewBid Crucible / Writing that stands up
Make the answer as strong as the work behind it.
Bid writing and review for UK charities and companies.
We get to know your organisation, draw out what makes it strong and show where it needs to improve. Then we build the bid around your evidence and what the buyer or funder needs.
Discuss my bid
See how the answer changes ↓Or call 07984 845440, or email [email protected].
Reviews: £195 for charities, £395 for companies. Writing from £500. The initial read is free. You hear back within 24 hours.
Base fees. An applicable award payment is additional, including for reviews. See award amounts and terms.
THE WORKING ANSWER01 / 04
Illustrative example, not a client bid
Who will lead the service handover? Explain their checks, name the lead and provide evidence of their relevant qualification.
The draft
Our experienced team will ensure a smooth handover.
Who is responsible? The draft does not say.
The clearer answer
The mobilisation coordinator owns the daily handover check and records unresolved service risks in the transition log.
Still needed: the named lead and evidence of their qualification.
A clearer answer.Evidence still matters.
Choose your starting point
What do you need to get submitted?
02 / One live deadline
Write the response
from £500
A finished application built from your evidence, with open decisions listed for you.
Scope and deadline agreed first. You approve and submit.
Explore the writing03 / Ongoing opportunities
A month of applications
from £750 a month
Find suitable opportunities and write the applications your agreed monthly plan includes.
Paid monthly in advance. A month's notice ends it. Company plans from £1,500 a month.
Explore monthly supportBudget for the award payment too. A grant or tender carries an additional payment if awarded, agreed before work starts. See amounts, due dates and full payment terms.
Read the detail for charities and grant applications or companies and tenders.
A real engagement / July 2026
Options 4 Change. Work you can check.
Options 4 Change first worked with us on several applications and have kept us on a monthly retainer since.
“Thank you for turning this around, the application is strong. I can see the thinking behind building the whole case around the technology piece.”
Theo Ilori writes the work. A reference call is available on request.
Read the complete caseThe check / Published case finding
Two totals. One application.
Amount requested
In the narrative≠Budget total
In the same application
In the narrative≠Budget total
In the same application
£822Mismatch found before submission
Overheads left out
Core costs the charity was entitled to ask for had not been fully included.
A live login in a PDF
A portal login travelled inside an earlier application. The charity was told when it was found.
Findings from one charity's papers before submission. These are not award results.
Inside the answer
Build a stronger answer.
Scroll through the example, or choose a step.
THE WORKING ANSWER01 / The question
Illustrative example, not a client bid
The buyer asksWho will lead the service handover? Explain their checks, name the lead and provide evidence of their relevant qualification.
Original
Our experienced team will ensure a smooth handover.
Source note
Role: mobilisation coordinator. Check: daily handover. Record: transition log for unresolved service risks. Named lead and qualification: not yet supplied.
Revised answer
The mobilisation coordinator owns the daily handover check and records unresolved service risks in the transition log.
Still needed: the named lead and evidence of their qualification.
A review includes the marked-up read and one round of selected changes. Writing from scratch is a separate service.
The question sets the test.
Start with the exact thing the buyer asks. Here it is responsibility during a service handover.
Confidence is not evidence.
The original promises an experienced team. It does not say who is responsible or what supports that claim.
Bring the source into the answer.
This illustrative planning note identifies a role and review rhythm. That is useful material for a specific response.
Improve the answer. Keep the open question.
The revised sentence now explains the responsibility. The qualification still needs to be supplied and checked.
Evidence before adjectives
Your organisation is the starting point
What makes you a fit?
Your delivery record, people and results identify the strongest case you can support.
What is missing?
A missing qualification or weak evidence stays visible. We identify what you need to supply or develop.
What does the question ask?
The answer connects your relevant strengths to the published criteria. It never invents capability.
Before any paid work starts
- The fee is fixed in writing first, and it does not move if the job turns out harder than it looked.
- The read on whether to bid is free, and it lands before any fee is agreed.
- For one-off work, half starts the work, and the other half is due on delivery. A retained month is paid in advance, and the first payment starts the work.
- One round of the changes you pick is made for you inside the fee, and anything wanted after that is quoted first.
- The marked-up copy stays yours whatever you decide to do next.
- You press submit, because we hold none of your portal logins.
- There is no VAT to add to the published fees. Any applicable award payment is additional to the base fee.
See why some answers carry more weight
The marks are set in the tender documents. They are printed in the guidance already open on your other screen. Explore how four illustrative scores contribute to a weighted total. This is a weighting tool, not an assessment of your bid.
Explore tender scoringChange a score. See its contribution.Open the scorecard →
Illustrative only. Your opportunity's published criteria, weightings and assessment method govern the real evaluation.
Tender Evaluation Scorecard
Illustrative scoring model. Demonstrates weighted procurement calculations without asserting actual contract award probabilities.
For each criterion, divide the selected grade by the highest grade, then multiply by its weighting. Add the contributions. Your actual tender may use a different method.
- 40 per cent
- Technical Quality and Operational Delivery
- 30 per cent
- Implementation Methodology and Mobilisation
- 20 per cent
- Social Value and Community Outcomes
- 10 per cent
- Business Continuity and Safeguarding
Use the criteria and assessment method in your own tender documents.
Try the scoring example
Tender Evaluation Scorecard
Illustrative scoring model. Demonstrates weighted procurement calculations without asserting actual contract award probabilities.
Evaluation Scale:
0: Completely Unacceptable (Fails to meet requirement) 1: Inadequate (Serious reservations across key areas) 2: Partially Compliant (Minor reservations, gaps in evidence) 3: Acceptable (Meets standard requirements with basic evidence) 4: Good (Exceeds expectations with robust verified evidence) 5: Outstanding (Comprehensive, fully evidenced and verified)
Service methodology, staffing ratios, governance structure and delivery standards
Score (0-5):
Unmarked
60-day transition timeline, handover protocols and operational risk management
Score (0-5):
Unmarked
Local employment, supply chain sustainability and measurable apprenticeship commitments
Score (0-5):
Unmarked
Escalation procedures, data protection compliance and continuous safeguarding audits
Score (0-5):
Unmarked
Weighted Score
0 per cent
Completion Status
0 of 4 criteria
Want an independent review of your draft before submission?
Explore a bid review
Our fixed-fee bid review reads your answers cold against the buyer's scoring rubric and flags evidence gaps before the deadline.
Get a clear decision before you commit
Send your contact details and the opportunity, with the deadline if known. The initial read comes back with a fixed fee and whether the bid is worth making. If it is a poor fit, you get the reasoning free.
You hear back within 24 hours.